Lissabonfördraget

 2008_11.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Ny upplaga av rapporten Lissabonfördraget 2008:11

Projekt och nätverk

 
 
Lissabonfördragets logga

 
 
Europaforum logga
 
 logo-tgae-II.gif
 
 

TAPF 
Transatlantic Policy Forum

 
 
EPIN logga
 
Sixth framework programme, öppnas i nytt fönster!
 
European Network for Better Regulation

 
New Modes of Governance Project

 

Home arrow Publications arrow Reports

Reports



Public Procurement and Labour in the EU (2010:3)

Print E-mail

2010_3.gifAuthors: Kerstin Ahlberg and Niklas Bruun*

Is it permissible, according to EU law, to take social considerations into account in the field of public procurement? Could one, for instance, promote gender equality, integration of disabled persons and good working conditions? The authors of the report Public Procurement and Labour in the EU believes that this is the case, but argues that Sweden could use this scope better than today.

Read more...
 

The Contribution of 14 European Think Tanks to the Spanish, Belgian and Hungarian Trio Presidency

Print E-mail

tgae_2010.gifEditors: Elvire Fabry and Gaëtane Ricard-Nihoul, Notre Europe

With the Lisbon Treaty in place – and the establishment of the permanent European Council presidency and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy – the role of the rotating presidencies and the Trio Presidency has changed. In a new report from Think Global – Act European (TGAE), this issue is scrutinized on the basis of the 18-month agenda of the Spanish, Belgian and Hungarian Trio Presidency. The report contains contributions and recommendations from experts representing 14 European research institutes and think thanks.

Read more...
 

Preliminary Rulings by the EU Court of Justice – The Attitude and Practice of the Swedish Courts

Print E-mail

2010_2.gifAuthor: Ulf Bernitz*

The Swedish courts, just as national courts in other member states, are these days integrated into a European legal and judicial system comprising the whole of the EU. Of core importance for the application and impact of EU law within the Swedish legal system, is the practice of requesting preliminary rulings from the EU Court of Justice. Today, it is more common for Swedish courts to request preliminary rulings, but the statistics suggests that there still exists a significant restrictiveness.

In the SIEPS report Preliminary Rulings by the Court of Justice – The Attitude and Practice of the Swedish Courts, Ulf Bernitz, Professor of European Law, argues that this restrictiveness might function to the detriment of the legal security of the parties in cases involving EU law.

The report is in Swedish, with a summary in English.


icon Förhandsavgöranden av EU-domstolen Svenska domstolars hållning och praxis (2010:2) (718 kB)

icon Sammanfattning 2010:2 (69.89 kB)

 icon Summary 2010:2 (70.67 kB)



* Ulf Bernitz is Professor of European Law at Stockholm University, Visiting Professor of Örebro University, as well as Senior Research Fellow at St Hilda´s College, University of Oxford He is also Director for the Wallenberg Foundation Oxford/Stockholm Association in European Law, based at the Institute of European Law, University of Oxford.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 13 of 85

Mailing list

To subscribe to Sieps mailing list, fill out the form. Don´t forget to check the In English box.